How must the code official respond if a proposed alternative material does not comply with the code?

The code official must respond in writing if a proposed alternative material does not comply with the code. This written response ensures that there is a formal record of the decision, which can be important for accountability, clarity, and future reference. A written response also provides the applicant with a clear outline of the issues related to the proposal and allows them the opportunity to address those issues if they wish to pursue an alternative path.

This formal communication helps maintain the integrity of the regulatory process, as it creates a documented basis for the decision, which can be critical in case of disputes or appeals regarding the proposed alternative. Furthermore, the written format allows both parties to have a clear understanding of the reasons for non-compliance and the requirements that must be met if the applicant wishes to revise their proposal for reconsideration.